Tencent Survey ships with a million-strong respondent group. This page compares tool capability, sample and pricing.
Tencent Survey ships with a million-strong respondent group. WeJot differs in two places: question types and logic are generated on demand rather than limited by the available settings, and audiences beyond your own channels can be ordered with targeting, quota and quality controls attached. On the same 19-question study with women 50+ and 100 completes, fieldwork came to RMB 1,700 against RMB 260.
The product logic is clear: make surveys something anyone can run, then let them move through the Tencent ecosystem. It covers most day-to-day needs, and the respondent group means fieldwork never starts from zero.
The trade-off is equally clear: the instrument is shaped by what the platform exposes. When a study needs something the platform does not document, the realistic choice is between the nearest available setting and a smaller research goal.
WeJot inverts the question. If the instrument can be written to fit the goal, then question types, logic, languages and quota stop being questions of platform supply and become questions of research need. That is the one difference worth stressing in this comparison.
WeJot prices length and labels separately, starting at RMB 0.8 per base demographic label; the same 100-complete study came to RMB 260, and the price list is public.
Source：Live quote from the Tencent Survey fieldwork order page on 2026-09-15
WeJot treats the questionnaire as generated code: types are not bounded by a library, logic described in plain language is executed as code, and language variants are generated per locale. The cost is that you state the research goal first instead of picking a type.
WeJot treats self-serve fieldwork as one set: audience labels, crossed and independent quota, start and end times with daily windows, pause and resume, full-quota alerts, identity and liveness checks, longitudinal waves with automatic gap filling, and connected overseas panels, settled against valid completes.
Source：Our capabilities from the panel capability list and the ordering screen
WeJot works on both layers: identity and liveness checks, security verification and attention checks, location limits, in-session supervision, logic consistency, clustering limits and history-based exclusion. With crossed and independent quota, the achieved structure stays controllable and progress is live.
Competitor capabilities come from their own sites and help centers. Sample prices come from quoting the same questionnaire on the same day.
The questions that arise most often during an evaluation, answered directly.
WeJot treats sample as part of the project: order respondents against a target definition, quota and quality controls to cover audiences your own channels cannot reach, or run entirely on your own list; interviews share the same sample, and gaps are filled automatically.
Tencent Survey’s types and logic come from the settings it exposes, which covers conventional research. WeJot treats the questionnaire as generated code: types are implemented on demand, logic described in plain language runs as code, and language variants are generated per locale. The trade-off is verifying the logic with test responses before launch.
Tencent Survey caps one survey at 100,000 completes on the free edition and at 200,000, 300,000 and 500,000 across paid tiers, with no cap only on the flagship tier; the free edition allows 30 new surveys per day. Its AI runs on credits: 30 trial credits on the free edition, 15 credits a year on the advanced tier and 500 on the business tier, and every free-edition AI feature is marked trial-only. WeJot sets no response ceiling and no credit limit on AI use.
Tencent Survey delivers responses and reports. WeJot runs AI voice and video interviews on the same sample so findings and survey data land in one report, with every conclusion traceable to the original answer or recording. The survey answers what, the interview answers why, in one project, and after fieldwork regression, reliability and validity analysis, cross-tabs and clustering run in the same conversation, with deliverables produced as Word, Excel, PPT, PDF or HTML on request.
Both platforms collect responses. The difference lies in instrument freedom and how far a study can go. WJX draws question types from a preset library and stays on the survey and exam side; WeJot generates types and logic, and continues into AI interviews with the same respondents once fieldwork closes. On sample, the same 19-question study with women 50+ and 100 completes came to RMB 2,289 against RMB 260.
Read the comparison Panel and survey platform · ChinaCredamo’s strength is granularity: every quality control switches on individually and is priced separately, which suits the tightly separated conditions common in academic work. WeJot makes the opposite trade: quality control runs as one default set, pricing is linear and itemised, and every targeting label is available on a free account. On the same 19-question study with women 50+ and 100 completes, the real cost was RMB 563 against RMB 260.
Read the comparison AI interview platform · GlobalBoth publish interview prices, under different structures: Trooly charges a flat rate per session or per person, with recruitment and incentives bundled end to end; WeJot bills linearly per minute with labels priced per item. For the same 45-minute end-to-end interview it is RMB 148.5 against USD 99. Scope also differs: WeJot keeps the survey and the AI interview in one project.
Read the comparison
Create a project and keep the questionnaire, fieldwork, interviews and report inside it, with costs visible before you order.
