Credamo’s quality controls are finer than most, with a solid reputation in academic research. Two billing traits shape the real budget: targeting is charged per audience dimension, and audience targeting sits behind a paid membership.
Credamo’s strength is granularity: every quality control switches on individually and is priced separately, which suits the tightly separated conditions common in academic work. WeJot makes the opposite trade: quality control runs as one default set, pricing is linear and itemised, and every targeting label is available on a free account. On the same 19-question study with women 50+ and 100 completes, the real cost was RMB 563 against RMB 260.
Credamo is built around a data marketplace: panel members enter the market and can be targeted by label, or you can run an anonymous study or collect through your own channels. Its quality switches are among the most granular in China, covering prior participation, credit score, historical acceptance rate, exclusion of specific surveys, device limits, identity verification and liveness detection.
The price stacks the same way: targeting costs a fee per audience dimension, each quality control is charged separately, and liveness sits a tier higher. Researchers can therefore find a precise balance between quality and cost. That is both the value and the complexity.
One precondition deserves emphasis: audience targeting is an advanced-tier entitlement, so the membership is paid before the capability can be used at all. A single study cannot amortise it.
WeJot does not tier capabilities. Every targeting label, quota setting and quality control is available directly, and the whole cost sits in the study. For teams running one or two projects, that matters more than unit price.
Source：Tiers and entitlements from the Credamo membership page, checked 2026-09
WeJot prices per item, so cost scales linearly with volume and can be calculated up front. With many dimensions and few completes it does not benefit from a one-off order-level fee the way Credamo does.
Source：Credamo’s public estimator, checked 2026-09-15
AI interviews in voice, video and text, sharing the sample and report with the survey, with resumable sessions, vision-driven probing and emotion analysis.
WeJot supports repeat waves on fixed samples with automatic gap filling, which covers common longitudinal needs. The difference sits in lab-based work: Credamo runs an HBO behavioural lab platform with eye-tracking and portable EEG products, and we do not provide that kind of physiological measurement.
Competitor capabilities come from their own sites and help centers. Sample prices come from quoting the same questionnaire on the same day.
The questions that arise most often during an evaluation, answered directly.
Credamo places many fieldwork features behind membership tiers: targeting, feature quota, liveness and screen recording need advanced; prior participation, credit score and identity verification need entry; scheduled release, full-screen answering, company logo and ad removal need enterprise. For the 100-complete case that means RMB 265 of fieldwork plus RMB 298 of membership, or RMB 563. WeJot does not tier labels, quota or quality controls, so the whole cost sits in the study: RMB 260.
Credamo’s switches are finer and priced individually, mostly RMB 0.2 per complete and RMB 0.5 for liveness, which lets you tune quality against cost precisely. That is real value. WeJot makes the opposite trade: identity and liveness checks, security verification and attention checks, location limits, in-session supervision, logic consistency and clustering limits, plus history-based exclusion, all run by default, and invalid completes are not counted. Identity and liveness checks consume resources per call.
Credamo has no AI interview product, so depth qualitative work means bringing in another tool. WeJot runs AI interviews in voice, video and text on the same sample and quota as the survey: the survey screens eligible participants, the interview goes deeper with the same people, and sessions, quota and fieldwork progress stay visible in one project, so scaled depth interviews fit inside a single academic workflow. After fieldwork, regression, reliability and validity analysis and cross-tabs run in the conversation, with deliverables produced as Word, Excel, PPT, PDF or HTML on request.
Start from a research goal: generate the questionnaire, configure sample and quota, run fieldwork and quality control, launch AI interviews where they add depth, then run regression, reliability and validity analysis and cross-tabs in the same conversation, with deliverables produced as Word, Excel, PPT, PDF or HTML on request. Survey, interviews and data stay in one project, every conclusion traces back to the original answer or recording, and costs are itemised and visible before you order.
Both platforms collect responses. The difference lies in instrument freedom and how far a study can go. WJX draws question types from a preset library and stays on the survey and exam side; WeJot generates types and logic, and continues into AI interviews with the same respondents once fieldwork closes. On sample, the same 19-question study with women 50+ and 100 completes came to RMB 2,289 against RMB 260.
Read the comparison Traditional survey platform · ChinaTencent Survey ships with a million-strong respondent group. WeJot differs in two places: question types and logic are generated on demand rather than limited by the available settings, and audiences beyond your own channels can be ordered with targeting, quota and quality controls attached. On the same 19-question study with women 50+ and 100 completes, fieldwork came to RMB 1,700 against RMB 260.
Read the comparison AI interview platform · GlobalBoth publish interview prices, under different structures: Trooly charges a flat rate per session or per person, with recruitment and incentives bundled end to end; WeJot bills linearly per minute with labels priced per item. For the same 45-minute end-to-end interview it is RMB 148.5 against USD 99. Scope also differs: WeJot keeps the survey and the AI interview in one project.
Read the comparison
Create a project and keep the questionnaire, fieldwork, interviews and report inside it, with costs visible before you order.
